Michael rhodin ibm biography of christopher

CLOSE 3 s. Santander Share. Madrid 4.

Michael rhodin ibm biography of christopher

Information for shareholders and investors. Corporate governance and remuneration policy. Biography - Santander International Banking Conference. Baccalaureate service will be held on Friday, May 6 with Rev. Christopher Bowen as the featured speaker. Watch commencement on the live stream at roanoke. The Class of is comprised of graduates from 29 states and eight home countries; 41 graduates are double majors and one is a triple major a rare instance but not the first time.

So far, IBM has faced a number of different hurdles commercializing Watson technology. According to The Wall Street Journal , customers have complained that translating Watson's ability to dominate Jeopardy into a business solution is extremely difficult. So, is Watson ready for your world? Could it help you make faster, smarter decisions about the most important aspects of your business today?

And how can you start experimenting with Watson today? The tech industry tends to be built out of lots of products that have very short shelf life. But the concept of Watson and the branding of Watson really have staying power. It was that people who watched that demonstration saw a glimpse of a future technology that they thought was going to be meaningful for a new generation.

The Jeopardy match stood for the beginning of a new era — a new era of systems that were going to be knowledge-based vs. We think this is only the third in the hundred-plus year history of the IT industry. The first era was tabulating machines that counted stuff. But the basic model is the same. The apps that run on your iPhone are running on the same programming models that were around for many, many years.

We invent new languages and the engineering has been spectacular over that time period. We think part of that is because these are areas of human life and professions that are judgment related. You need to have the ability to reason through problems, not just write a program to give you an answer off a piece of data. Rhodin: Right. Context and clarification and dialog and ever-changing information sources and most of the information is not what programs are good at dealing with — standard relational rows and columns.

The information itself is completely unstructured. Coming out of the Jeopardy match we had to do what any technology company does when they have a really amazing piece of research technology — and at that point in time we had a great piece of technology that knew how to answer one question for one user in under 3 seconds. It needed to be a cloud-based system with APIs that enabled people to reach out and use the services.

We spent the better part of two years after the Jeopardy match doing what I would call classic market and technology validation. We evolved the technology, we made it more robust, but at the same time we were working with a half-dozen clients in healthcare and financial services — brave companies that wanted to work with really raw, emerging technology.

Their view was they could get a lot out of learning with the technology along the way. Our view was that we needed help figuring out what the use cases were going to be. Then last summer we came to the conclusion that the technology had evolved enough and there was a second wave of technology starting to come out of IBM Research that was additive to it.

We put that plan in place over the fall and then we launched it in January with the formation of the Watson Group. When we were putting the plan in place, we came to the conclusion that this new business needed to have a freedom of action different than just another new business unit within the organization. It needed to really act and operate like an emerging startup that had the freedom to make quick decisions, to twist and turn in the market as things were evolving and really move forward at a quick pace.

Probably the most well-known example was the PC company, when we segregated that and put it down in Boca back in That became the basis for an entire industry. Many people today still call them IBM-compatible PCs even though we got out of the business 10 years ago. But the architecture and the machines that we created then spawned an entire industry of machines and then clearly gave way to Microsoft and Intel becoming very dominant in the PC industry.

We created a wholly owned subsidiary called ISSC. We felt this was one of those moments. We decided to set it up as a separate group. Group structure in IBM is a [specific] designation. IBM Global Services is a group.